Connection in an Isolating Age

And yet another reason Hufflepuffs own the world. (Taken with instagram)

Taken with instagram

I can’t decide if this is just ironic or actual geekfiti. (Taken with instagram)

murphypop:

Heroine #1: Katniss Everdeen for @quiverby 

ithrewyoutheobvious:

#DAMMIT JAMES THIS IS WHY WE CANNOT HAVE NICE THINGS

PRONGS YOU ARE DRUNK. 

THIS

Reblogging for the comments. 

(Source: onlylolgifs, via bonerblainer)

(Source: mantheboundaries, via wantthepharaohs)

h-u-m-a-n-y-w-u-m-a-n-y:

nobodycouldbethat-clever:

vasovagalsyncope:

torestorrange:

hiddlestoner:

datglasses:

himmelgruen:

zoequinn:

itseveryshadeofwrong:

andwhatofmysoulmine:

benedictclarke:

Woman in Black.

Brilliant.

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows….oh my

Sweeney Todd OMFG

Thor.

Frankenstein Junior. Well… yeeeeees. 

Hitchcock’s Psycho………………shite…

Fight Club

Shiiiiiiiit

  Black Hawk Down

We need to talk about Kevin

The Lincoln Lawyer. 

Hanna

ossum I’m a badass

The Help. … I’m… I don’t even know what to do with that. 

(Source: slutformisha, via the-fayz)

dftbawkward:

thedailywhat:

Santorum Santorum Says of the Day: Gone mostly unnoticed until very recently is a comment made by presidential candidate Rick Santorum during a December 30th NBC News interview, in which he made clear his intention to nullify all legal same-sex marriages currently in existence across the country.

The latest census data, collected in 2010, puts the number of married same-sex couples at 131,000, but that number is likely higher now.

Santorum said he plans to introduce an amendment to the Constitution that would not only make same-sex marriages illegal throughout the nation in perpetuity, but would also invalidate all existing unions.

“We can’t have 50 different marriage laws in this country,” he remarked. “You have to have one marriage law.”

The former Senator has come under fire in the past for comparing same-sex marriages to the matrimony of “man on child” and “man on dog.”

Both Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich has expressed their intention to ban same-sex marriage through a Constitutional amendment, but have not gone so far as to demand the retroactive nullification of existing marriages.

Ron Paul, who is personally opposed to same-sex marriage, says the federal government should not be involved in deciding who can and cannot get married.

Asked how he would go about getting such an amendment approved, given growing public support for gay rights, Santorum inadvertently made a powerful appeal to history in favor of marriage equality.

“Just because public opinion says something doesn’t mean it’s right,” he said. “I’m sure there were times in areas of this country when people said blacks were less than human.”

[sfgate.]

Just… America, what is WRONG with you that this man can actually be a candidate? 

Ok, all of this aside, the comment ‘I’m sure that…” means that he doesn’t actually -know-. How the bleep can he not actually know that? It’s history. There was a lot of American history where black people were considered less than human. I just… how the frell can this man even consider being a leader? He has no clue what he’s actually leading. I don’t mind people who I don’t agree with. I wouldn’t mind a leader that I wasn’t completely behind if I had confidence in them as a leader. This man… honestly scares me, and I don’t get scared much. Why have we degraded our government so much that we vote for people who we agree with on specific issues rather than on their ability to lead? “A representative owes his people not only his industry, but his judgement, and he betrays them if he sacrifices that to their opinion” ~Edmund Burke

(via julvett)